Welcome, Guest -  Log In |  Register |  Shopping Cart
 

CLINICAL/FORENSICS ARTICLE

Simplify and Speed Up Opiates Analysis

Using LC/MS/MS & an Allure® PFP Propyl HPLC Column

By Kristi Sellers, Innovations Chemist
  • 7-minute analysis time, for increased sample throughput.
  • Faster sample prep—no derivatization required.
  • Separate compounds with similar mass spectra.

Introduction

Opiates are one of the primary drug classes tested in clinical and forensic laboratories. The most common confirmation methods typically use GC/MS. These methods require derivatization of the target compounds which lengthens sample preparation time. Here we present an alternative confirmation method, by LC/MS/MS, which can be used to increase sample throughput by eliminating derivatization and shortening analysis time. Confirmation and quantification of compounds that have similar mass spectra is also possible with this procedure. Here, we use an Allure® PFP Propyl column to chromatographically separate opiates that share product ions, allowing positive identification based on retention time.

Procedure

An LC/MS/MS method was developed for the analysis of opiates. The goals of the project were to obtain baseline resolution of compounds having similar mass spectra while providing an analysis time of less than 10 minutes. To accomplish this, mass spectrometer conditions, column selection, mobile phase, and gradient profiling were evaluated and optimized.

A Shimadzu LC20 Prominence Series HPLC system coupled with an Applied Biosystems/MDS Sciex API 3200™ MS/MS system was used in this investigation. After mass spectrometry conditions were optimized for each compound, the resulting mass spectra were used to generate +MRM (multiple reaction monitoring) methods. Since MS/MS was used, we were able to target two +MRM transitions per compound to verify the identity of each compound. Table I shows the +MRM transitions and the mass spectrometer conditions. Standards contained morphine, hydromorphone, oxymorphone, codeine, hydrocodone, oxycodone, and 6-monoacetylmorphine (6-MAM) in methanol. The on-column concentration used for column evaluations was 250ng for all compounds.

Several different stationary phases were evaluated including an aqueous C18, a biphenyl, a propyl cyano, and a pentaflurophenyl propyl stationary phase. Consistent column dimensions and base silica (50mm, 2.1mmID, 5µm particle size, and 60Å pore size) were used for all phases; mobile phase conditions were optimized for each stationary phase. Mobile phases tested included: 0.1% formic acid in water, 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile, and 0.1% formic acid in methanol in various combinations. A variety of gradient profiles also were evaluated.

Results

Although two +MRM transitions were targeted for each compound, some compounds such as codeine and hydrocodone, shared all monitored product ions (Figure 1). Since these compounds have similar mass spectra, two peaks appear in the extracted ion chromatograms. This made it necessary to separate codeine and hydrocodone chromatographically and identify compound peaks by retention time. Morphine and hydromorphine present the same challenge. The results of this study showed that of the stationary phases tested, the pentafluorophenyl propyl phase (Allure® PFP Propyl column) produced the best chromatographic separation and peak shape. Baseline resolution of opiates that shared the same product ions was achieved on an Allure® PFP Propyl column in a total analysis time of 7 minutes (Figure 2). Mobile phase gradient and composition had a significant effect on peak shape and resolution (data not shown) and optimized analytical conditions were used.

Conclusions

Here we demonstrate the Allure® PFP Propyl column, coupled with an Applied Biosystems/MDS Sciex API 3200™ MS/MS system and a Shimadzu LC20 Prominence Series HPLC, produced positive identification of opiates while reducing sample preparation time and keeping analysis time short. Use of the Allure® PFP Propyl column and the LC/MS/MS method shown here can increase sample throughput and is recommended for routine opiates analysis.

Figure 1 Codeine and hydrocodone share product ions and must be separated chromatographically.

A. Codeine
LC_PH0457

LC_PH0457
B. Hydrocodone

LC_PH0458

LC_PH0458
Sample: opiates
Inj.: 10µL
Conc: 25ug/mL
Solvent: methanol
Column:

Allure® PFP Propyl

Cat.#: 9169552
Dimensions: 50mm x 2.1mm
Particle Size: 5µm
Pore Size: 60 Å
Conditions  
Mobile Phase:

A: 0.1% formic acid in water
B: 0.1% formic acid in 80:20, methanol:acetonitrile

Time:
%B
0.0
10
3.00
50
6.00
50
6.10
10
8.10
Stop pumps
Flow rate: 0.40mL/min.
Ion Source: Electrospray, positive
Temp: 30°C
Det: Applied Biosystems/MDS Sciex API 3200™ MS/MS system
IonSpray Voltage: 5500
Gas 1 65psi (448kPa)
Gas 2 45psi (310kPa)
Source Temp: 600°C

Figure 2 Fully resolve opiates with shared product ions (morphine/hydromorphine and codeine/hydrocodeine) on an Allure® PFP Propyl column.

Peak List:  
Compound Mass
1. morphine 286*
2. oxymorphone 302
3. hydromorphone 286*
4. codeine 300**
5. 6-MAM 328
6. oxycodone 316
7. hydrocodone 300**

A. Multiple reaction monitoring (+MRM) using transitions in Table 1

lc_ph0454
LC_PH0454

B. Total Ion Chromatogram

lc_ph0459
LC_PH0459
See Figure 1 for conditions.

Table I +MRM Transitions for Opiates.

Mass Spectrometer Experiments:
Compound
Q1
Q3
Declustering Potential (V)
Collision Energy (V)
Morphine
286
152
46
79
Morphine
286
165
46
51
Hydromorphone
286
185
46
41
Hydromorphone
286
157
46
55
Oxymorphone
302
227
36
37
Oxymorphone
302
198
36
55
Codeine
300
152
46
85
Codeine
300
115
46
89
Hydrocodone
300
199
46
39
Hydrocodone
300
128
46
39
Oxycodone
316
240
31
39
Oxycodone
316
256
31
33
6-Monoacetylmorphine
328
211
51
55
6-Monoacetylmorphine
328
193
51
35