VOCs via Static Headspace/GC/MS is not old hat - new DIN 38407-43
7 Jul 2013Introduction
Clean water is a valuable asset to mankind. Every government therefore has its own regulation on water quality. For the territory of the European Union the “EU Water Framework Directive” gives the governmental frame for water quality monitoring. The chemical composition of surface water and ground water is described in terms of Priority Substances, which are in fact a mixture of substances and substance classes. A good portion of them can be observed via GC techniques, especially the Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC).
Due to the installed base of instruments, static headspace is generally the first choice in measuring VOCs in Germany as well as in the rest of Europe. Mass spectroscopy has become the most popular detection system in this analytical field during the last 10 years. Using the requirements of the European Water Framework Directive and the most popular instrumentation, a new DIN Standard method was created and validated in a qualified round robin under leadership of chairwomen Ute Brüll-Pehl from the governmental lab from LANUV (Regional Authority for Nature, Environment and Customer Care) in Düsseldorf. The resulting DIN 38407-43 is available as a draft.
To show the capability of this DIN method a data set of 53 VOCs was chosen as base for the validation round robin, discussed and approved by the responsible DIN working group (Tab. 1).
Reference Material
As different compounds show different relative response factors in the mass spectrometer due to varying ionization efficiencies and different headspace distribution equilibrations, the calibration and the validation of a multi parameter method requires multiple calibration runs at a wide range of concentrations. This is needed to create an acceptable calibration curve for each compound. To minimize this work, Restek introduced a multi component mix with three different concentration levels for the different compounds, based on an extensive study of distribution equilibria and detection responses for defined qualifier ions. This complex study, done by the LANUV lab under leadership of Mrs. Brüll-Pehl, led to a reference standard mix with comparable peak areas per compound at each dilution, which makes it easy to run a calibration with only one dilution series. This interesting concept leads to a new and powerful strategy in setting up Mega Mixes or Multi-Component Mixes.
GC Column
The Restek RXI-624Sil MS column, a modified 624 phase with Silarylene backbone, is the ideal column for this method because it shows an optimized separation, especially for the earliest eluting compounds.
The following measurements show the use of both Restek reference standards as well as GC column technology to fulfill all requirements of the new DIN 38407-43 draft and the European Water Framework Directive.
Measurements
Shown measurements were performed by Axel Semrau GmbH, Germany, using a DANI Master SHS Gas chromatograph with Static Headspace Autosampler, combined with a Thermo Fisher Trace DSQ II mass spectrometer.
Reference standards from Restek were used for calibration (VOA Standard Kit #1-3 + Vinylchloride, cat. No. # 567783, #567784, #567785, #567787)
A 60 m x 0.25 mm x 1.4 μm Restek Rxi-624Sil MS was chosen as GC-Column (cat. No. # 13869)
Headspace Sampler settings
Oven temp.: 80°C Manifold temp.: 120°C Transferline temp.: 200°C Incubation time: 30 min Aux pressure: 1 bar Nitrogen Pressure equilibration: 0.2 min Injection time: 30 s Injection mode: Standard Vial Venting: Ja (yes?) Injection volume: 1 mL Sample volume: 10 mL Vial volume: 20 mL
GC Settings
Oven program: 40 °C (1 min) -> 4 °C/min -> 120 °C (5 min) -> 4 °C/min -> 140 °C (4 min) -> 25 °C/min -> 280 °C (4.4 min) Injector temp.: 200 °C Carrier gas flow: 1.2 mL/min Helium Split ratio: 1:10
Mass Spec. settings
Ionisation mode: EI Ion source temp.: 200 °C Transferline temp.: 250 °C Data sampling rate: 5 spectra/sec, full scan
Compounds and Target Ions as discussed in the DIN Group (Tab. 1)
Compound | target ion | qualifier 1 | qualifier 2 |
Dichloromethane | 84 | 86 | 49 |
Trichloromethane | 83 | 85 | 47 |
1,1,1-Trichloroethane | 97 | 99 | 117 |
Tetrachloromethane | 117 | 119 | 121 |
Trichloroethene | 130 | 95 | 132 |
1,1,2-Trichloroethane | 97 | 83 | 99 |
Tetrachloroethene | 166 | 129 | 164 |
1,1-Dichlorethane | 63 | 83 | 65 |
1,1-Dichloroethene | 61 | 96 | 63 |
1,2-Dichloroethane | 62 | 64 | 98 |
1,2-Dichloropropane | 63 | 62 | 76 |
2,3-Dichloropropene | 75 | 110 | 77 |
Hexachloroethane | 117 | 201 | 119 |
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane | 101 | 151 | 103 |
Chloroprene | 53 | 88 | |
Hexachlorobutadiene | 225 | 260 | 227 |
1,2-Dibromomethane | 107 | 109 | |
1,2-Dichlorobenzene | 146 | 111 | 148 |
1,3-Dichlorobenzene | 146 | 111 | 148 |
1,4-Dichlorobenzene | 146 | 111 | 148 |
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene | 180 | 145 | 182 |
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene | 180 | 145 | 182 |
1,3,5-Trichlorobenzene | # | # | # |
Vinylchloride | 62 | 64 | 56 |
Allylchloride | # | # | # |
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene | 96 | 61 | 98 |
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene | 96 | 61 | 98 |
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene | 75 | 110 | 77 |
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene | 75 | 110 | 77 |
Benzene | 78 | 77 | 50 |
Toluene | 91 | 92 | 65 |
Ethylbenzene | 91 | 106 | |
o-Xylene | 91 | 106 | |
m/p-Xylene | 91 | 106 | |
Styrene | 78 | 104 | |
Chlorobenzene | 112 | 77 | 114 |
2-Chlorotoluene | 91 | 126 | |
3-Chlorotoluene | 91 | 126 | |
4-Chlorotoluene | 91 | 126 | |
Cumol | 105 | 120 | |
n-Propylbenzene | 91 | 120 | |
MTBE | 73 | 57 | 61 |
ETBE | 59 | 87 | 57 |
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane | 131 | 117 | 133 |
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene | 105 | 120 | |
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene | 105 | 120 | |
Bromodichloromethane | 83 | 85 | 129 |
Tribromochloromethane | 173 | 175 | 171 |
Dibromochloromethane | 129 | 127 | 131 |
Naphthaline | 128 | 102 | |
Dichlorodiisopropylether | 45 | 121 | |
Biphenyl | 154 | 153 | 76 |
TAME | 55 | 73 | |
Internal Standards | |||
Toluene-D8 | 98 | 100 | |
1,2-Dichloroethane-D4 | 65 | 67 | 102 |
4-Bromofluorobenzene | 175 | 176 | 95 |
First part of the TIC Chromatogram of the new Restek Reference Standard Kit
Second part of the TIC Chromatogram of the new Restek Reference Standard Kit
TIC chromatogram of a doped wastewater sample
TIC Chromatogram of a doped surface water sample
The complete measurements, performed by Axel Semrau GmbH, can be found here:
http://www.axel-semrau.de/en/Downloads.html
A complete analysis of the described round robin will be part of the validation documents of the DIN 38407-43, possibly in final form at the end of this year.
Restek Corp. wants to thank Mrs. Brüll-Pehl and her laboratory staff for the intensive and successful collaboration and Dr. Rüdiger Kohl, Axel Semrau GmbH, for performing the shown measurements.